Skip to content
Codes

Forex prop firms

FundingPips alternatives

Updated 2026-10-26

Short answer

FTMO is our top pick among FundingPips alternatives, because its split path is simpler: 80% rising to 90%, with no consistency gate on the 2-Step. The firms below each differ from FundingPips in at least one concrete way, from split shape and payout speed to fee refunds and news freedom.

How we picked

We compared firms against FundingPips' own terms: route-based splits, with weekly, bi-weekly, and on-demand routes, and a 100% on-demand route tied to a 35% consistency rule and 7 profitable days. Each pick below differs on split shape, payout speed, fee refunds, or news freedom, with the difference stated in its own words.

FTMO logo

1. FTMO

Best for Simpler split path

4.8 · 55,057 reviews

FTMO differs from FundingPips on split simplicity. FTMO starts at 80% and rises to 90% through its Scaling Plan or Premium Programme, with no consistency gate on the 2-Step, while FundingPips ties its 100% on-demand route to a 35% consistency rule and 7 profitable days. FTMO pays on demand from day 14 with a $20 minimum payout.

Cheapest plan
€79
Top split
90%
Plans tracked
20
Code
None right now
Full FTMO review →
E8 Markets logo

2. E8 Markets

Best for Flat 80% on demand

4.1 · 3,302 reviews

E8 One differs from FundingPips on payout speed and split shape. E8 One pays a flat 80% on demand with the first payout after 3 days, while FundingPips routes payouts by cycle, with its 100% route gated behind consistency and profitable-day conditions. E8 One costs $488 for $100,000, with a 9% target and a 4% daily limit.

Cheapest plan
$28
Top split
80%
Plans tracked
28
Code
E8 · 30%
Full E8 Markets review →
Blue Guardian logo

3. Blue Guardian

Best for Fixed payout rhythm

3.2 · 2,106 reviews

Blue Guardian differs from FundingPips on payout rhythm. Blue Guardian pays every 14 days, with a 7-day add-on available, rather than by route-based cycles, and its 1-Step Standard plan now carries a 9% target and 3 qualifying days. Weekend holding is allowed on all account types, matching FundingPips' weekend permission on its Flex, Pro, and Standard plans.

Cheapest plan
$10
Top split
90%
Plans tracked
31
Code
None right now
Full Blue Guardian review →
FundedNext logo

4. FundedNext

Best for Refundable 2-Step fee

4.5 · 82,183 reviews

FundedNext differs from FundingPips on fee refunds. Its Stellar 2-Step fee is refundable, with 8% then 5% targets, a 5% daily limit on the initial balance, and a 10% static floor. Its first withdrawal arrives at 21 days, then every 14 days, with a $20 minimum payout and an 80% profit split.

Cheapest plan
$32.99
Top split
80%
Plans tracked
22
Code
START6K · 39%
Full FundedNext review →
The5ers logo

5. The5ers

Best for Two-payment Bootcamp plan

4.7 · 40,413 reviews

The5ers Bootcamp differs from FundingPips on payment shape. Bootcamp costs $300 in total for $100,000, paid as $95 upfront and $205 only on reaching the funded stage, rather than a single upfront fee. It uses 6% targets in three phases with a 5% static floor and a 50% split, against FundingPips' route-based splits that rise to 100% on demand.

Cheapest plan
$22
Top split
80%
Plans tracked
18
Code
None right now
Full The5ers review →
Lark Funding logo

6. Lark Funding

Best for News freedom after funding

4.3 · 517 reviews

Lark Funding differs from FundingPips on news freedom after funding. Lark puts no restrictions on news trading in any stage, while FundingPips restricts profit on trades opened or closed within 5 minutes of high-impact news on a Master Account. Lark 1-Step carries a 10% target, a 5% daily limit, and a 7% static maximum loss.

Cheapest plan
$200
Top split
90%
Plans tracked
10
Code
None right now
Full Lark Funding review →

Not sure yet? Try the prop firm finder.

Frequently asked questions

What is FundingPips' consistency gate, exactly?

The 100% on-demand route requires a 35% consistency rule and 7 profitable days of at least 0.5% each. Lower routes pay less: weekly routes pay 60% and bi-weekly routes pay 80% on the Standard plan. The gate is the reason traders who want 100% without conditions look elsewhere.

Which alternative pays on demand without a gate?

E8 One, with a flat 80% split on demand and the first payout after 3 days, and FTMO, with payouts on demand from day 14 and no consistency gate on the 2-Step. Both trade a lower headline split for a payout rule with no profitable-day conditions attached.

What should I check before switching from FundingPips?

Check the split route you would actually use, not the headline split. A 100% route with a consistency gate pays less than a flat 80% route if the gate blocks your withdrawals. Then check the first payout day and the news rule. Prop trading can cost you every fee you pay.

Prices are list prices from each firm's own site at our last update. Rankings are never paid. Prop trading can cost you every fee you pay.